FRBR and cataloging

What is FRBR and how will it affect cataloging?

By Carolyn J. McCallum

Published as a report in 1998 by the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA), Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) presented a new conceptual model of the bibliographic universe that takes into account the needs of users of bibliographic data. The FRBR model identifies and examines four tasks utilized by information seekers in discovering information. They are: find, identify, select, and obtain.

The FRBR model is based on the entity-relationship analysis technique common in database design. It is highly theoretical, system-neutral, and code-neutral (i.e. not a set of cataloging rules). Entities (e.g. persons, works, concepts) are linked together by specific relationships.  Entities and relationships are defined and identified by specific, prescribed attributes.

There are ten FRBR entities, and these are arranged into three groups. Group 1 entities are “the products of intellectual or artistic endeavors. In other words, it is all of the resources to which we provide access through our catalogs (Zhang & Salaba, 2009, p. 14).”  Group 1 entities comprise:

  • Work — a distinct intellectual or artistic creation
  • Expression — the intellectual or artistic realization of a work
  • Manifestation — the physical embodiment of an expression of a work
  • Item — a single exemplar of a manifestation (Zhang & Salaba, 2009, p. 14).

The Group 1 entities work and expression are abstract concepts, while manifestation and item reference physical objects.

Group 2 entities include Person and Corporate Body, “agents who are responsible for the intellectual or artistic content, the physical production and dissemination, or the custodianship of any Group 1 entity (Zhang & Salaba, 2009, p. 17).” Group 3 entities are the subjects of works and include Concept, Object, Event, and Place. Group 1 and Group 2 entities may also be subjects of works.

Illustrated below is a hierarchical view of the Group 1 entities and their relationships to each other which form the basis of the FRBR model.

(Illustration source: from Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records: Final Report, 1998: Figure 3.1.)

“A work is realized through an expression, which in turn is embodied in a manifestation, which is exemplified by an item (Zhang & Salaba, 2009, p. 15).”

To illustrate the Group 1 entities and their relationships, the following example is provided. Maurice Sendak imagined a tale about a mischievous boy, who is sent to bed without his supper, sails to the land of the wild things, where he becomes their king. The abstract idea behind Mr. Sendak’s tale is the work that readers have come to know as Where the Wild Things Are. This tale can have multiple expressions in various languages. For example, the tale was originally published in English, but has since been translated (i.e. expressed) into other various languages (e.g. German, Finnish). The manifestation of each expression of a work can be embodied in different formats (e.g. print, electronic, audio recording, etc.). For instance, Harper & Row originally published Where the Wild Things Are in English as a book in 1963 (making it a manifestation of the English language expression of Where the Wild Things Are), and the German translation was published in 1967 by Diogenes Verlag (this edition is a manifestation of the German expression of the work).  A copy of a publication (i.e that which is sitting on a shelf, lying on a table, tucked in a bookbag, etc.) relates to the entity item in the FRBR model.

How will FRBR affect cataloging? First, integrated library system (ILS) vendors will need to develop catalogs that implement and manage the FRBR model. Once developed, catalogers will describe a work and its expressions only once, thus making their work more efficient and less time consuming. “Current practice, which is based on cataloging manifestations, requires the repetition of work and expression information every time a new manifestation is described (Zhang & Salaba, 2009, p. 49).” FRBR can help increase creation and utilization of uniform title authority records which would lead to easier identification of works and expressions. RDA (Resource Description and Access) cataloging standards are based on FRBR, and future implementation of both will promote uniform metadata creation that will hopefully “facilitate interoperability and, therefore, will allow bibliographic information to be shared not only among all libraries in the world but also between all information agencies, such as museums, digital libraries, and archives (Zhang & Salaba, 2009, p. 34).”

This explanation of FRBR is a simple one and just scratches the surface of this complex conceptual model. For more detailed information, here are three suggested titles for reading:

International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions, Study Group on the   Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records. 1998. Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records: Final Report. Munich, Germany: K. G. Saur. Available: http://www.ifla.org/publications/functional-requirements-for-bibliographic-records/

Maxwell, Robert L. FRBR: A Guide for the Perplexed. Chicago: American Library Association, 2008.

Zhang, Yin, and Athena Salaba. Implementing FRBR in Libraries: Key Issues and Future Directions. New York: Neal-Schuman, 2009.

One Response to FRBR and cataloging

  1. Pingback: Article Summary for Lecture #4 – Carlyle – Phyllis-Ophical

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s